All Activity

This stream auto-updates   

  1. Today

  3. super fan ako nito, bumili pa nga ako ng first issue ng comics na ito….kaso limited series lang pala sa tv, baka one season or two lang mag show....
  4. Gone to soon! #xxxtentacion #preach #wordlife

  5. RT @HistoryInPics: This man offering motivational music during a battle in Sirte, Libya, against forces loyal to Muammar Gaddafi in 2011. h…

  6. Yesterday
  7. RT @dailytxtmsg: I wish I can go back in time and change a few things.

  8. Taken for fucking granted.

  9. I liked a @YouTube video Sony's Intelligent Auto and Superior Auto Modes

  10. RT @akoposimarcelo: Kid memorizes elements. Kid memorizes train stations. Me: Saiha, Nadare, Homura, Setsuna, Madoka, Rui, Kokuu, and Ress…

  11. I liked a @YouTube video E3 2018 with Dr DisRespect | Part Two

  12. RT @G3RA7D: Time to solve this as civilized people RT: night mode Fav: day mode

  13. @janadivinegrace tinakwil q na lahat ng baby ko eh hehe

  14. @OMGitsTino Wala ka bang bayag?

  15. just got the p20 pro and i must say the camera is really good coming from a former galaxy note 5 user
  16. Huawei P20 Pro international giveaway @androidauth #giveaway

  17. RT @wyattEcoyoty: See I told you guys. Islam nak bunuh murtad.

  18. RT @MrJamesMay: Those stats show that Germany was better at everything, except accuracy. It explains why Mexico is so good at building cars.

  19. Last week
  20. one person followed me and one person unfollowed me // automatically checked by

  21. This is actually based from crimes of passion observed in other countries. It is not weird, but is an expected response by an enraged busband. But if you think this is weird, I will give you a “weirder”perspective of this case by giving you actual cases. There was a case decided by the SC in 1939, People vs. Gonzales. What happened in this case was the husband caught his wife with another man, doing acts preparatory to sexual intercourse, in short, “foreplay.” To make the long story short, the enraged husband ran after the man, but was unable to catch him. So he went back to the house, attacked her wife without intending to kill her, but her wife died anyway. The Supreme Court convicted the husband of parricide, and did not exculpate him from killing, applying strictly the aforementioned provision. They said that for the provision to apply, the husband should have caught them in the act of sexual intercourse. Although there is one justice who dissented, finding it unfair that the killing was not justified because the act would definitely lead into sexual intercourse, and it is contrary to natural response for the husband to wait for the actual carnal act for him to act accordingly. However, in 1987, the Supreme Court, in People vs. Abarca, made another ruling. So in this case, the husband did not actually catch his wife having sex with another man, but only learned of it an hour after. He killed the man an hour after the sexual act. The Supreme Court, surprisingly, applied this case, justifying the act of killing, although it happened an hour after, because the law “only requires that the death caused be the proximate result of the outrage overwhelming the accused after chancing upon his spouse in the basest act of infidelity.”
  22. @Jiggseyyy di naman ikaw eh


  24. Post merged and moved in appropriate thread, 2nd warning given to @jason4181.
  25. RT @TSM: The summer split starts today with our first match against CLG! #TSMWIN

  26. RT @ArchDaily: The Case For A Smaller House: Talking Clients Out of The Big House They Want to Build…

  1. Load more activity