Hiniram ko muna post ni @carlo1225 and credits na rin sa model/photographer. I don't intend to undermine the model/photographer here but i just want to ask you guys, which do you prefer unedited shots or edited. Here in the great shot of DK, the pubic and pit regions are edited, usually dark spots, inconsistencies in lighting/shadows and stubble (not saying there are stubble here) were edited. medyo minsan sumosobra naman at meron din naman RAW files ang mismong nilalagay sa kanilang folio and di na ineedit.
if you ask me, i would prefer unedited makikita kasi ang skills di lang ng photographer, pati ng model, HMUA and lighting staffs. what's your opinion guys?